| |
[Author’s
name]
[Instructor’s name]
[Course title]
[Date]
Affirmative Action
There
is still need of Affirmative action in society
in employment, public contracting, and in the
academy. And of these three arenas, the fields
of higher education are the most barren and in
desperate need of leadership and tending from
affirmative action professionals. It has been
strongly argued that people of color have made
great progress socially and economically. Because
they perceive that progress has been made, they
conclude that efforts like affirmative action
are outdated, unfair and unnecessary. The fact
is that racism, discrimination, exclusion and
economic marginalization based on skin color continue
to impede the progress of, and are a part of the
current reality for too many, people of color
in this country (Soto).
The Center for Individual Rights (the organization
behind the law suits at the University of Texas)
in October 1997 filed a lawsuit against the University
of Michigan on behalf of two white students who
were denied admission last year. The lawsuit claims
the university's affirmative action policies discriminate
against "qualified" whites in favor
of "unqualified" minority students.
University President Lee Bollinger says the school
will not back down: "For almost 200 years,
public universities have unlocked the doors to
social and economic opportunity to students from
many different backgrounds. We believe it is absolutely
essential that they continue to do so."
Students of color continue to suffer from the
neglect, disinterest, mis-guidance, and passive
hostilities of educators and educational systems
that just don't understand, don't care about,
or don't see the too often negative consequences
of being a person of color in this country even
after thirty-three years after passage of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Soto, 1997).
“I know some people are honestly concerned
about the times affirmative action doesn't work,
when it's done in the wrong way. And I know there
are times when some employers don't use it in
the right way. They may cut corners and treat
a flexible goal as a quota. They may give opportunities
to people who are unqualified instead of those
who deserve them. They may, in so doing, allow
a different kind of discrimination. When this
happens, it is also wrong. But it isn't affirmative
action, and it is not legal.” (Clinton)
In spite of the fact the recent U.S. Court of
Appeals 5th Circuit decision (Hopwood v. University
of Texas, 1996), the use of race as one of many
appropriate criteria to consider in making admissions
decisions in higher education is permitted (Bakke
v. University of California-Davis, U.S. Supreme
Court, 1978). The Supreme Court refused to hear
an appeal case on Proposition 209 and lets the
decisions of the lower courts stand in November
1997, which means that the prohibition on affirmative
action in California has been upheld. This was
not a decision by the Supreme Court (though they
decided not to hear the case) and it arguably
does not set a national precedent. However, one
should note that the House Judiciary Committee
is set to continue its work on legislation similar
to Proposition 209. This legislation would ban
the federal government from granting preferences
in hiring, contracting and other programs. Anti-affirmative
action drives and ballot initiatives also abound
in Washington state, Houston, and Michigan.
"Affirmative action programs stamp minorities
with a badge of inferiority" no matter how
competent they are or how hard they work. The
beneficiaries of special treatment, says Justice
Thomas, too often "develop dependencies or
adopt an attitude that they are entitled to preferences."
A rollback of affirmative action by the courts,
politicians, and public opinion, however, does
not leave the nation at a dead end in terms of
economic fairness and group equity. Instead, it
can open the roads that lead to the real causes
of inequality. In the black community, progress
in lowering the high dropout rates in schools
and raising the proportion of intact families
would produce more upward mobility than all of
the government's affirmative action programs combined
(Reiland).
The critics of affirmative action do not see the
need for, and thus do not offer, reasonable alternatives
to affirmative action. Nor do they take any personal
responsibility for finding reasonable solutions
to problems that undergird the need for affirmative
action. The majority of Affirmative Action's critics
refuse to take any direct and meaningful action
to eliminate the racism that continues to negatively
impact on a daily basis the lives of people of
color (Soto, 1997). Those who most vehemently
denounce affirmative action are typically the
ones who have the power and authority to do something
to make affirmative action unnecessary. For example,
implementing alternatives that will ensure that
people of color who are qualified are not always
at a disadvantage, such as finding solutions to
the oppressive social conditions that have plagued
people of color in this hemisphere since 1492,
such as eliminating racism and its effects in
their own sphere of influence and authority (Soto,
1997). Their attacks on affirmative action and
their refusal to act affirmatively do nothing
to remedy the situations and conditions that continue
to make affirmative action necessary.
According to Soto (1997) affirmative action is
not anachronistic, dead, or useless. It is timely,
alive and very much needed. A dominant culture
controlling and reaping the benefits and privileges
of power, while qualified and deserving people
of color (and others similarly disenfranchised,
e.g., gays/lesbians, women, immigrants, the poor)
continue to struggle for inclusion, equal opportunity,
and acknowledgment that they too are worthy partners
in American society. Abolishment of racism in
this country will go far toward eliminating the
need for Affirmative Action programs (Soto, 1997).
However, rejection of Affirmative Action programs,
will do nothing to eliminate the racism that justifies
the continued existence of these programs.
Works Cited
Clinton,
Bill. Mend it, Don’t end it. June 10, 2002
http://aad.english.ucsb.edu/docs/clinton.html
Reiland,
Ralph R. Affirmative Action or Equal Opportunity?
June 10, 2002 <http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/reg18n3-x.html>
Soto,
Jose. Commentary on Affirmative Action. 1997
Retrieved on June 10, 2002 <http://aad.english.ucsb.edu/docs/Jose-Soto.html>
|